Savannah Guthrie and Craig Melvin faced backlash after failing to mention I’m Still Here, the Oscar-winning Brazilian film, during the Today Show. The hosts have now broken their silence, explaining why they deliberately avoided discussing the film. Their shocking revelation hints at an unfolding scandal that could shake the entertainment industry.

The Controversy Surrounding Savannah Guthrie and Craig Melvin
Savannah Guthrie and Craig Melvin, two of the most recognized faces on NBC’s Today Show, have found themselves at the center of a media storm. Their decision to omit I’m Still Here from their post-Oscar coverage has drawn heavy criticism from viewers and social media users alike. The Brazilian film, which made history by winning Best International Feature Film at the 97th Academy Awards, was noticeably absent from the show’s discussions, leading to an outcry online.
Read more:
- NBC announced they signed another “special deal” with Hoda Kotb after she officially left Today: “She deserves to shine more than in that place.”
- Sheinelle Jones and Craig Melvin mocked Dylan Dreyer for being late to the Third Hour, calling it “another boycott” against the “poor girl”: “She’s so broke she had to take the bus here.”
- Al Roker shared that his daughter Leila “never ceases to amaze me” as he revealed she now has a “partner,” and it’s someone of the same gender!
The film, directed by Walter Salles, tells the powerful story of Eunice Paiva’s fight for justice after the disappearance of her husband, Rubens Paiva, during Brazil’s military dictatorship. I’m Still Here not only resonated with audiences worldwide but also reignited discussions about Brazil’s amnesty law and the impunity of past human rights violations.
Viewers were quick to call out Today Show for the omission. A user on X (formerly Twitter) wrote, “Did the @TODAYshow simply ignore I’m Still Here? What the F???? It’s embarrassing the arrogance…” Others speculated whether there was a deeper reason behind the snub.

Savannah Guthrie and Craig Melvin Speak Out
After days of speculation and growing outrage, Savannah Guthrie finally addressed the issue, offering an explanation that left audiences stunned. Speaking on the matter, she revealed that their decision was not accidental but deliberate.
Read more:
- Jenna Bush Hager admitted feeling “angry” after Hoda Kotb’s departure from ‘Today’ due to how it impacted her mental well-being: “I receive threatening messages every day.”
- SURREAL Jenna made Hoda burst into laughter as she revealed how she got her husband to “shut up” when he found a gift suddenly sent to her by an ex, who said he missed her!
- Jenna Bush Hager revealed that former President George W. Bush gave her an 8-word piece of advice when she called him crying after learning that Hoda Kotb would be leaving “Today”: ‘Turns out he’s the one who made Hoda leave…’
“We were aware of I’m Still Here and its historical significance,” Guthrie stated. “But behind the scenes, there were whispers of something much bigger brewing. The last thing we wanted was to be caught in the middle of a potential scandal.”
Guthrie did not elaborate on the specifics of the alleged scandal but hinted that certain individuals associated with the film were under scrutiny. “The industry is unpredictable, and when you hear rumors about something about to be exposed, sometimes the safest option is to steer clear,” she added.
Craig Melvin echoed her sentiments, adding, “We take journalistic integrity seriously. If we had reason to believe that discussing the film might lead us into controversial territory, we had to make a judgment call. It was a difficult decision, but we stand by it.”
While neither Guthrie nor Melvin provided direct details, industry insiders have speculated that the alleged scandal might involve political tensions or undisclosed controversies related to the film’s production. Some theories suggest that I’m Still Here’s critical stance on authoritarian regimes may have led to pressure from influential figures, discouraging media outlets from amplifying its message.
Others believe that legal challenges or behind-the-scenes conflicts among the film’s creators could have played a role in its exclusion from mainstream discussions. If this speculation holds true, Guthrie and Melvin’s reluctance to engage with the topic may have been a strategic move to avoid unintended consequences.

The Broader Impact on the Film Industry
The controversy has sparked a broader conversation about how mainstream media handles sensitive political films and awards coverage. Some critics argue that media outlets have a responsibility to highlight films that bring historical injustices to light, regardless of external pressures.
Walter Salles, the director of I’m Still Here, has not directly commented on the Today Show controversy but expressed disappointment in the lack of recognition for the film by certain platforms. “This story is bigger than just an award,” he said in a recent interview. “It’s about remembering the past and ensuring justice for those who suffered. We cannot afford to stay silent.”
This situation also raises questions about journalistic responsibility and the influence of political and corporate interests in shaping news coverage. Should media personalities take a stand despite potential risks, or should they prioritize caution over confrontation?
As more details unfold, the decision made by Guthrie and Melvin will continue to be scrutinized. Their explanation suggests a deeper, more complicated narrative than a simple oversight. Whether their silence was justified or a missed opportunity to spotlight an important film, only time will tell.
For now, audiences remain divided. Some believe that Guthrie and Melvin acted wisely in avoiding potential controversy, while others see their decision as a failure to uphold journalistic integrity.

What do you think about the controversy? Should journalists avoid potentially scandalous topics, or should they face them head-on? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below!